Brussels vs Schaerbeek

Overall Schaerbeek ranks higher for livability (69 vs 67). Schaerbeek is cheaper; Schaerbeek is safer from disasters; Schaerbeek is warmer.
Compared (0-100)
■ Brussels■ Schaerbeek4549Cost9393Climate6769Safety

How to read the comparison chart

The grouped bars score each city 0–100 on cost, climate and safety — taller is better. Brussels leads on any axis where its bar is higher, Schaerbeek where its is. The cost bar uses a higher-is-cheaper scale, so Schaerbeek's taller cost bar reflects its lower cost of living, not a higher price.

AxisBrusselsSchaerbeek
Livability6769
Cost (higher=cheaper)4549
Climate9393
Safety6769
Summer °C17.617.6
Winter °C3.03.0
Top disaster riskfloodingflooding

Brussels vs Schaerbeek: the short answer

Schaerbeek comes out ahead on overall livability (69/100), only marginally above Brussels (67/100). The two cities diverge most on cost of living. On affordability Schaerbeek is the cheaper base — nearly identical prices on our cost index (Brussels 45 vs Schaerbeek 49, where a higher score means a lower cost of living, normalised from World Bank price levels). For climate, Schaerbeek runs warmer in summer (about 17.6°C peak vs 17.6°C in Brussels), while winter lows sit near 3.0°C in Brussels and 3.0°C in Schaerbeek. On natural-disaster exposure Schaerbeek is the safer choice (safety 69/100); the dominant modelled hazard is flooding for Brussels and flooding for Schaerbeek.

Which city should you choose?

Data & methodology

Cost scores are normalised from World Bank price-level data. Climate figures (summer highs, winter lows) are drawn from 1991–2020 climate normals. Disaster-safety blends USGS earthquake history (magnitude 4.5+ within 300 km since 1980), tropical-cyclone basin position, flood/elevation exposure and Köppen climate zone. The livability score is the weighted composite of cost, climate and safety. All figures are planning indicators for 2026, not guarantees — verify specifics before relocating.

Compiled by the CityLivably data team from open public datasets (World Bank, USGS, climate normals).

FAQ

Is Brussels or Schaerbeek better to live in?

Schaerbeek scores higher overall — 69 vs 67 on our 0–100 livability index, which weights cost, climate and safety.

Which is cheaper, Brussels or Schaerbeek?

Schaerbeek has the lower cost of living (cost index 49 vs 45; higher = cheaper, from World Bank price levels).

Which is warmer, Brussels or Schaerbeek?

Schaerbeek — summer highs reach about 17.6°C versus 17.6°C in Brussels.

Which is safer from natural disasters, Brussels or Schaerbeek?

Schaerbeek (disaster-safety 69/100). Main hazard: flooding in Brussels, flooding in Schaerbeek.

What is the main natural-disaster risk in Brussels?

flooding is the dominant modelled hazard for Brussels on our risk index.

How is the Brussels vs Schaerbeek comparison calculated?

Cost comes from World Bank price levels, climate from 1991–2020 normals, and disaster risk from USGS earthquake data, cyclone-basin position and flood exposure; livability is their weighted composite.

Brussels profile →
Schaerbeek profile →