Cluj-Napoca vs Braşov

Overall Cluj-Napoca ranks higher for livability (63 vs 62). Braşov is cheaper; Braşov is safer from disasters; Cluj-Napoca is warmer.
Compared (0-100)
■ Cluj-Napoca■ Braşov4848Cost7976Climate6565Safety

How to read the comparison chart

The grouped bars score each city 0–100 on cost, climate and safety — taller is better. Cluj-Napoca leads on any axis where its bar is higher, Braşov where its is. The cost bar uses a higher-is-cheaper scale, so Braşov's taller cost bar reflects its lower cost of living, not a higher price.

AxisCluj-NapocaBraşov
Livability6362
Cost (higher=cheaper)4848
Climate7976
Safety6565
Summer °C18.415.5
Winter °C-3.5-4.9
Top disaster riskextreme cold / winterextreme cold / winter

Cluj-Napoca vs Braşov: the short answer

Cluj-Napoca comes out ahead on overall livability (63/100), only marginally above Braşov (62/100). The two cities diverge most on climate. On affordability Braşov is the cheaper base — nearly identical prices on our cost index (Cluj-Napoca 48 vs Braşov 48, where a higher score means a lower cost of living, normalised from World Bank price levels). For climate, Cluj-Napoca runs warmer in summer (about 18.4°C peak vs 15.5°C in Braşov), while winter lows sit near -3.5°C in Cluj-Napoca and -4.9°C in Braşov. On natural-disaster exposure Braşov is the safer choice (safety 65/100); the dominant modelled hazard is extreme cold / winter for Cluj-Napoca and extreme cold / winter for Braşov.

Which city should you choose?

Data & methodology

Cost scores are normalised from World Bank price-level data. Climate figures (summer highs, winter lows) are drawn from 1991–2020 climate normals. Disaster-safety blends USGS earthquake history (magnitude 4.5+ within 300 km since 1980), tropical-cyclone basin position, flood/elevation exposure and Köppen climate zone. The livability score is the weighted composite of cost, climate and safety. All figures are planning indicators for 2026, not guarantees — verify specifics before relocating.

Compiled by the CityLivably data team from open public datasets (World Bank, USGS, climate normals).

FAQ

Is Cluj-Napoca or Braşov better to live in?

Cluj-Napoca scores higher overall — 63 vs 62 on our 0–100 livability index, which weights cost, climate and safety.

Which is cheaper, Cluj-Napoca or Braşov?

Braşov has the lower cost of living (cost index 48 vs 48; higher = cheaper, from World Bank price levels).

Which is warmer, Cluj-Napoca or Braşov?

Cluj-Napoca — summer highs reach about 18.4°C versus 15.5°C in Braşov.

Which is safer from natural disasters, Cluj-Napoca or Braşov?

Braşov (disaster-safety 65/100). Main hazard: extreme cold / winter in Cluj-Napoca, extreme cold / winter in Braşov.

What is the main natural-disaster risk in Cluj-Napoca?

extreme cold / winter is the dominant modelled hazard for Cluj-Napoca on our risk index.

How is the Cluj-Napoca vs Braşov comparison calculated?

Cost comes from World Bank price levels, climate from 1991–2020 normals, and disaster risk from USGS earthquake data, cyclone-basin position and flood exposure; livability is their weighted composite.

Cluj-Napoca profile →
Braşov profile →