Colombo vs Dehiwala-Mount Lavinia

Overall Dehiwala-Mount Lavinia ranks higher for livability (61 vs 59). Dehiwala-Mount Lavinia is cheaper; Dehiwala-Mount Lavinia is safer from disasters; Colombo is warmer.
Compared (0-100)
■ Colombo■ Dehiwala-Mount Lavinia4648Cost7879Climate5558Safety

How to read the comparison chart

The grouped bars score each city 0–100 on cost, climate and safety — taller is better. Colombo leads on any axis where its bar is higher, Dehiwala-Mount Lavinia where its is. The cost bar uses a higher-is-cheaper scale, so Dehiwala-Mount Lavinia's taller cost bar reflects its lower cost of living, not a higher price.

AxisColomboDehiwala-Mount Lavinia
Livability5961
Cost (higher=cheaper)4648
Climate7879
Safety5558
Summer °C28.428.2
Winter °C26.726.5
Top disaster riskfloodingstorms (hurricane/cyclone)

Colombo vs Dehiwala-Mount Lavinia: the short answer

Dehiwala-Mount Lavinia comes out ahead on overall livability (61/100), only marginally above Colombo (59/100). The two cities diverge most on natural-disaster exposure. On affordability Dehiwala-Mount Lavinia is the cheaper base — nearly identical prices on our cost index (Colombo 46 vs Dehiwala-Mount Lavinia 48, where a higher score means a lower cost of living, normalised from World Bank price levels). For climate, Colombo runs warmer in summer (about 28.4°C peak vs 28.2°C in Dehiwala-Mount Lavinia), while winter lows sit near 26.7°C in Colombo and 26.5°C in Dehiwala-Mount Lavinia. On natural-disaster exposure Dehiwala-Mount Lavinia is the safer choice (safety 58/100); the dominant modelled hazard is flooding for Colombo and storms (hurricane/cyclone) for Dehiwala-Mount Lavinia.

Which city should you choose?

Data & methodology

Cost scores are normalised from World Bank price-level data. Climate figures (summer highs, winter lows) are drawn from 1991–2020 climate normals. Disaster-safety blends USGS earthquake history (magnitude 4.5+ within 300 km since 1980), tropical-cyclone basin position, flood/elevation exposure and Köppen climate zone. The livability score is the weighted composite of cost, climate and safety. All figures are planning indicators for 2026, not guarantees — verify specifics before relocating.

Compiled by the CityLivably data team from open public datasets (World Bank, USGS, climate normals).

FAQ

Is Colombo or Dehiwala-Mount Lavinia better to live in?

Dehiwala-Mount Lavinia scores higher overall — 61 vs 59 on our 0–100 livability index, which weights cost, climate and safety.

Which is cheaper, Colombo or Dehiwala-Mount Lavinia?

Dehiwala-Mount Lavinia has the lower cost of living (cost index 48 vs 46; higher = cheaper, from World Bank price levels).

Which is warmer, Colombo or Dehiwala-Mount Lavinia?

Colombo — summer highs reach about 28.4°C versus 28.2°C in Dehiwala-Mount Lavinia.

Which is safer from natural disasters, Colombo or Dehiwala-Mount Lavinia?

Dehiwala-Mount Lavinia (disaster-safety 58/100). Main hazard: flooding in Colombo, storms (hurricane/cyclone) in Dehiwala-Mount Lavinia.

What is the main natural-disaster risk in Colombo?

flooding is the dominant modelled hazard for Colombo on our risk index.

How is the Colombo vs Dehiwala-Mount Lavinia comparison calculated?

Cost comes from World Bank price levels, climate from 1991–2020 normals, and disaster risk from USGS earthquake data, cyclone-basin position and flood exposure; livability is their weighted composite.

Colombo profile →
Dehiwala-Mount Lavinia profile →