Fukuoka vs Kobe

Overall Kobe ranks higher for livability (58 vs 58). Kobe is cheaper; Kobe is safer from disasters; Kobe is warmer.
Compared (0-100)
■ Fukuoka■ Kobe4444Cost8780Climate4853Safety

How to read the comparison chart

The grouped bars score each city 0–100 on cost, climate and safety — taller is better. Fukuoka leads on any axis where its bar is higher, Kobe where its is. The cost bar uses a higher-is-cheaper scale, so Kobe's taller cost bar reflects its lower cost of living, not a higher price.

AxisFukuokaKobe
Livability5858
Cost (higher=cheaper)4444
Climate8780
Safety4853
Summer °C25.827.7
Winter °C4.05.5
Top disaster riskstorms (hurricane/cyclone)storms (hurricane/cyclone)

Fukuoka vs Kobe: the short answer

Kobe comes out ahead on overall livability (58/100), only marginally above Fukuoka (58/100). The two cities diverge most on climate. On affordability Kobe is the cheaper base — nearly identical prices on our cost index (Fukuoka 44 vs Kobe 44, where a higher score means a lower cost of living, normalised from World Bank price levels). For climate, Kobe runs warmer in summer (about 27.7°C peak vs 25.8°C in Fukuoka), while winter lows sit near 4.0°C in Fukuoka and 5.5°C in Kobe. On natural-disaster exposure Kobe is the safer choice (safety 53/100); the dominant modelled hazard is storms (hurricane/cyclone) for Fukuoka and storms (hurricane/cyclone) for Kobe.

Which city should you choose?

Data & methodology

Cost scores are normalised from World Bank price-level data. Climate figures (summer highs, winter lows) are drawn from 1991–2020 climate normals. Disaster-safety blends USGS earthquake history (magnitude 4.5+ within 300 km since 1980), tropical-cyclone basin position, flood/elevation exposure and Köppen climate zone. The livability score is the weighted composite of cost, climate and safety. All figures are planning indicators for 2026, not guarantees — verify specifics before relocating.

Compiled by the CityLivably data team from open public datasets (World Bank, USGS, climate normals).

FAQ

Is Fukuoka or Kobe better to live in?

Kobe scores higher overall — 58 vs 58 on our 0–100 livability index, which weights cost, climate and safety.

Which is cheaper, Fukuoka or Kobe?

Kobe has the lower cost of living (cost index 44 vs 44; higher = cheaper, from World Bank price levels).

Which is warmer, Fukuoka or Kobe?

Kobe — summer highs reach about 27.7°C versus 25.8°C in Fukuoka.

Which is safer from natural disasters, Fukuoka or Kobe?

Kobe (disaster-safety 53/100). Main hazard: storms (hurricane/cyclone) in Fukuoka, storms (hurricane/cyclone) in Kobe.

What is the main natural-disaster risk in Fukuoka?

storms (hurricane/cyclone) is the dominant modelled hazard for Fukuoka on our risk index.

How is the Fukuoka vs Kobe comparison calculated?

Cost comes from World Bank price levels, climate from 1991–2020 normals, and disaster risk from USGS earthquake data, cyclone-basin position and flood exposure; livability is their weighted composite.

Fukuoka profile →
Kobe profile →