Ho Chi Minh City vs Rome

Overall Rome ranks higher for livability (64 vs 54). Rome is cheaper; Rome is safer from disasters; Ho Chi Minh City is warmer.
Compared (0-100)
■ Ho Chi Minh City■ Rome3943Cost7498Climate5255Safety

How to read the comparison chart

The grouped bars score each city 0–100 on cost, climate and safety — taller is better. Ho Chi Minh City leads on any axis where its bar is higher, Rome where its is. The cost bar uses a higher-is-cheaper scale, so Rome's taller cost bar reflects its lower cost of living, not a higher price.

AxisHo Chi Minh CityRome
Livability5464
Cost (higher=cheaper)3943
Climate7498
Safety5255
Summer °C29.124.4
Winter °C25.97.7
Top disaster riskstorms (hurricane/cyclone)wildfire

Ho Chi Minh City vs Rome: the short answer

Rome comes out ahead on overall livability (64/100), clearly above Ho Chi Minh City (54/100). The two cities diverge most on climate. On affordability Rome is the cheaper base — nearly identical prices on our cost index (Ho Chi Minh City 39 vs Rome 43, where a higher score means a lower cost of living, normalised from World Bank price levels). For climate, Ho Chi Minh City runs warmer in summer (about 29.1°C peak vs 24.4°C in Rome), while winter lows sit near 25.9°C in Ho Chi Minh City and 7.7°C in Rome. On natural-disaster exposure Rome is the safer choice (safety 55/100); the dominant modelled hazard is storms (hurricane/cyclone) for Ho Chi Minh City and wildfire for Rome.

Which city should you choose?

Data & methodology

Cost scores are normalised from World Bank price-level data. Climate figures (summer highs, winter lows) are drawn from 1991–2020 climate normals. Disaster-safety blends USGS earthquake history (magnitude 4.5+ within 300 km since 1980), tropical-cyclone basin position, flood/elevation exposure and Köppen climate zone. The livability score is the weighted composite of cost, climate and safety. All figures are planning indicators for 2026, not guarantees — verify specifics before relocating.

Compiled by the CityLivably data team from open public datasets (World Bank, USGS, climate normals).

FAQ

Is Ho Chi Minh City or Rome better to live in?

Rome scores higher overall — 64 vs 54 on our 0–100 livability index, which weights cost, climate and safety.

Which is cheaper, Ho Chi Minh City or Rome?

Rome has the lower cost of living (cost index 43 vs 39; higher = cheaper, from World Bank price levels).

Which is warmer, Ho Chi Minh City or Rome?

Ho Chi Minh City — summer highs reach about 29.1°C versus 24.4°C in Rome.

Which is safer from natural disasters, Ho Chi Minh City or Rome?

Rome (disaster-safety 55/100). Main hazard: storms (hurricane/cyclone) in Ho Chi Minh City, wildfire in Rome.

What is the main natural-disaster risk in Ho Chi Minh City?

storms (hurricane/cyclone) is the dominant modelled hazard for Ho Chi Minh City on our risk index.

How is the Ho Chi Minh City vs Rome comparison calculated?

Cost comes from World Bank price levels, climate from 1991–2020 normals, and disaster risk from USGS earthquake data, cyclone-basin position and flood exposure; livability is their weighted composite.

Ho Chi Minh City profile →
Rome profile →