‘Ibrī vs Şalālah
How to read the comparison chart
The grouped bars score each city 0–100 on cost, climate and safety — taller is better. ‘Ibrī leads on any axis where its bar is higher, Şalālah where its is. The cost bar uses a higher-is-cheaper scale, so Şalālah's taller cost bar reflects its lower cost of living, not a higher price.
| Axis | ‘Ibrī | Şalālah |
|---|---|---|
| Livability | 53 | 60 |
| Cost (higher=cheaper) | 49 | 49 |
| Climate | 46 | 72 |
| Safety | 63 | 61 |
| Summer °C | 34.9 | 29.5 |
| Winter °C | 18.1 | 22.0 |
| Top disaster risk | drought | drought |
‘Ibrī vs Şalālah: the short answer
Şalālah comes out ahead on overall livability (60/100), modestly above ‘Ibrī (53/100). The two cities diverge most on climate. On affordability Şalālah is the cheaper base — nearly identical prices on our cost index (‘Ibrī 49 vs Şalālah 49, where a higher score means a lower cost of living, normalised from World Bank price levels). For climate, ‘Ibrī runs warmer in summer (about 34.9°C peak vs 29.5°C in Şalālah), while winter lows sit near 18.1°C in ‘Ibrī and 22.0°C in Şalālah. On natural-disaster exposure ‘Ibrī is the safer choice (safety 63/100); the dominant modelled hazard is drought for ‘Ibrī and drought for Şalālah.
Which city should you choose?
- On a tight budget → Şalālah — lower everyday costs..
- You want warmth → ‘Ibrī — hotter summers.
- Safety is the priority → ‘Ibrī — lower disaster risk.
- Best all-rounder → Şalālah — highest overall livability.
Data & methodology
Cost scores are normalised from World Bank price-level data. Climate figures (summer highs, winter lows) are drawn from 1991–2020 climate normals. Disaster-safety blends USGS earthquake history (magnitude 4.5+ within 300 km since 1980), tropical-cyclone basin position, flood/elevation exposure and Köppen climate zone. The livability score is the weighted composite of cost, climate and safety. All figures are planning indicators for 2026, not guarantees — verify specifics before relocating.
FAQ
Is ‘Ibrī or Şalālah better to live in?
Şalālah scores higher overall — 60 vs 53 on our 0–100 livability index, which weights cost, climate and safety.
Which is cheaper, ‘Ibrī or Şalālah?
Şalālah has the lower cost of living (cost index 49 vs 49; higher = cheaper, from World Bank price levels).
Which is warmer, ‘Ibrī or Şalālah?
‘Ibrī — summer highs reach about 34.9°C versus 29.5°C in Şalālah.
Which is safer from natural disasters, ‘Ibrī or Şalālah?
‘Ibrī (disaster-safety 63/100). Main hazard: drought in ‘Ibrī, drought in Şalālah.
What is the main natural-disaster risk in ‘Ibrī?
drought is the dominant modelled hazard for ‘Ibrī on our risk index.
How is the ‘Ibrī vs Şalālah comparison calculated?
Cost comes from World Bank price levels, climate from 1991–2020 normals, and disaster risk from USGS earthquake data, cyclone-basin position and flood exposure; livability is their weighted composite.