Irákleion vs Kallithéa

Overall Irákleion ranks higher for livability (66 vs 64). Kallithéa is cheaper; Kallithéa is safer from disasters; Kallithéa is warmer.
Compared (0-100)
■ Irákleion■ Kallithéa4950Cost9687Climate5757Safety

How to read the comparison chart

The grouped bars score each city 0–100 on cost, climate and safety — taller is better. Irákleion leads on any axis where its bar is higher, Kallithéa where its is. The cost bar uses a higher-is-cheaper scale, so Kallithéa's taller cost bar reflects its lower cost of living, not a higher price.

AxisIrákleionKallithéa
Livability6664
Cost (higher=cheaper)4950
Climate9687
Safety5757
Summer °C24.926.6
Winter °C10.68.9
Top disaster riskearthquakeearthquake

Irákleion vs Kallithéa: the short answer

Irákleion comes out ahead on overall livability (66/100), only marginally above Kallithéa (64/100). The two cities diverge most on climate. On affordability Kallithéa is the cheaper base — nearly identical prices on our cost index (Irákleion 49 vs Kallithéa 50, where a higher score means a lower cost of living, normalised from World Bank price levels). For climate, Kallithéa runs warmer in summer (about 26.6°C peak vs 24.9°C in Irákleion), while winter lows sit near 10.6°C in Irákleion and 8.9°C in Kallithéa. On natural-disaster exposure Kallithéa is the safer choice (safety 57/100); the dominant modelled hazard is earthquake for Irákleion and earthquake for Kallithéa.

Which city should you choose?

Data & methodology

Cost scores are normalised from World Bank price-level data. Climate figures (summer highs, winter lows) are drawn from 1991–2020 climate normals. Disaster-safety blends USGS earthquake history (magnitude 4.5+ within 300 km since 1980), tropical-cyclone basin position, flood/elevation exposure and Köppen climate zone. The livability score is the weighted composite of cost, climate and safety. All figures are planning indicators for 2026, not guarantees — verify specifics before relocating.

Compiled by the CityLivably data team from open public datasets (World Bank, USGS, climate normals).

FAQ

Is Irákleion or Kallithéa better to live in?

Irákleion scores higher overall — 66 vs 64 on our 0–100 livability index, which weights cost, climate and safety.

Which is cheaper, Irákleion or Kallithéa?

Kallithéa has the lower cost of living (cost index 50 vs 49; higher = cheaper, from World Bank price levels).

Which is warmer, Irákleion or Kallithéa?

Kallithéa — summer highs reach about 26.6°C versus 24.9°C in Irákleion.

Which is safer from natural disasters, Irákleion or Kallithéa?

Kallithéa (disaster-safety 57/100). Main hazard: earthquake in Irákleion, earthquake in Kallithéa.

What is the main natural-disaster risk in Irákleion?

earthquake is the dominant modelled hazard for Irákleion on our risk index.

How is the Irákleion vs Kallithéa comparison calculated?

Cost comes from World Bank price levels, climate from 1991–2020 normals, and disaster risk from USGS earthquake data, cyclone-basin position and flood exposure; livability is their weighted composite.

Irákleion profile →
Kallithéa profile →