London vs Ho Chi Minh City

Overall Ho Chi Minh City ranks higher for livability (66 vs 58). Ho Chi Minh City is cheaper; London is safer from disasters; Ho Chi Minh City is warmer.
Compared (0-100)
■ London■ Ho Chi Minh City662Cost9774Climate7763Safety

How to read the comparison chart

The grouped bars score each city 0–100 on cost, climate and safety — taller is better. London leads on any axis where its bar is higher, Ho Chi Minh City where its is. The cost bar uses a higher-is-cheaper scale, so Ho Chi Minh City's taller cost bar reflects its lower cost of living, not a higher price.

AxisLondonHo Chi Minh City
Livability5866
Cost (higher=cheaper)662
Climate9774
Safety7763
Summer °C17.729.1
Winter °C4.625.9
Top disaster riskfloodingstorms (hurricane/cyclone)

London vs Ho Chi Minh City: the short answer

Ho Chi Minh City comes out ahead on overall livability (66/100), clearly above London (58/100). The two cities diverge most on cost of living. On affordability Ho Chi Minh City is the cheaper base — a wide gap on our cost index (London 6 vs Ho Chi Minh City 62, where a higher score means a lower cost of living, normalised from World Bank price levels). For climate, Ho Chi Minh City runs warmer in summer (about 29.1°C peak vs 17.7°C in London), while winter lows sit near 4.6°C in London and 25.9°C in Ho Chi Minh City. On natural-disaster exposure London is the safer choice (safety 77/100); the dominant modelled hazard is flooding for London and storms (hurricane/cyclone) for Ho Chi Minh City.

Which city should you choose?

Data & methodology

Cost scores are normalised from World Bank price-level data. Climate figures (summer highs, winter lows) are drawn from 1991–2020 climate normals. Disaster-safety blends USGS earthquake history (magnitude 4.5+ within 300 km since 1980), tropical-cyclone basin position, flood/elevation exposure and Köppen climate zone. The livability score is the weighted composite of cost, climate and safety. All figures are planning indicators for 2026, not guarantees — verify specifics before relocating.

Compiled by the CityLivably data team from open public datasets (World Bank, USGS, climate normals).

FAQ

Is London or Ho Chi Minh City better to live in?

Ho Chi Minh City scores higher overall — 66 vs 58 on our 0–100 livability index, which weights cost, climate and safety.

Which is cheaper, London or Ho Chi Minh City?

Ho Chi Minh City has the lower cost of living (cost index 62 vs 6; higher = cheaper, from World Bank price levels).

Which is warmer, London or Ho Chi Minh City?

Ho Chi Minh City — summer highs reach about 29.1°C versus 17.7°C in London.

Which is safer from natural disasters, London or Ho Chi Minh City?

London (disaster-safety 77/100). Main hazard: flooding in London, storms (hurricane/cyclone) in Ho Chi Minh City.

What is the main natural-disaster risk in London?

flooding is the dominant modelled hazard for London on our risk index.

How is the London vs Ho Chi Minh City comparison calculated?

Cost comes from World Bank price levels, climate from 1991–2020 normals, and disaster risk from USGS earthquake data, cyclone-basin position and flood exposure; livability is their weighted composite.

London profile →
Ho Chi Minh City profile →