Madīnat Ḩamad vs Ar Rifā‘

Overall Ar Rifā‘ ranks higher for livability (53 vs 52). Ar Rifā‘ is cheaper; Ar Rifā‘ is safer from disasters; Ar Rifā‘ is warmer.
Compared (0-100)
■ Madīnat Ḩamad■ Ar Rifā‘4950Cost4646Climate6162Safety

How to read the comparison chart

The grouped bars score each city 0–100 on cost, climate and safety — taller is better. Madīnat Ḩamad leads on any axis where its bar is higher, Ar Rifā‘ where its is. The cost bar uses a higher-is-cheaper scale, so Ar Rifā‘'s taller cost bar reflects its lower cost of living, not a higher price.

AxisMadīnat ḨamadAr Rifā‘
Livability5253
Cost (higher=cheaper)4950
Climate4646
Safety6162
Summer °C34.834.8
Winter °C16.116.1
Top disaster riskdroughtdrought

Madīnat Ḩamad vs Ar Rifā‘: the short answer

Ar Rifā‘ comes out ahead on overall livability (53/100), only marginally above Madīnat Ḩamad (52/100). The two cities diverge most on cost of living. On affordability Ar Rifā‘ is the cheaper base — nearly identical prices on our cost index (Madīnat Ḩamad 49 vs Ar Rifā‘ 50, where a higher score means a lower cost of living, normalised from World Bank price levels). For climate, Ar Rifā‘ runs warmer in summer (about 34.8°C peak vs 34.8°C in Madīnat Ḩamad), while winter lows sit near 16.1°C in Madīnat Ḩamad and 16.1°C in Ar Rifā‘. On natural-disaster exposure Ar Rifā‘ is the safer choice (safety 62/100); the dominant modelled hazard is drought for Madīnat Ḩamad and drought for Ar Rifā‘.

Which city should you choose?

Data & methodology

Cost scores are normalised from World Bank price-level data. Climate figures (summer highs, winter lows) are drawn from 1991–2020 climate normals. Disaster-safety blends USGS earthquake history (magnitude 4.5+ within 300 km since 1980), tropical-cyclone basin position, flood/elevation exposure and Köppen climate zone. The livability score is the weighted composite of cost, climate and safety. All figures are planning indicators for 2026, not guarantees — verify specifics before relocating.

Compiled by the CityLivably data team from open public datasets (World Bank, USGS, climate normals).

FAQ

Is Madīnat Ḩamad or Ar Rifā‘ better to live in?

Ar Rifā‘ scores higher overall — 53 vs 52 on our 0–100 livability index, which weights cost, climate and safety.

Which is cheaper, Madīnat Ḩamad or Ar Rifā‘?

Ar Rifā‘ has the lower cost of living (cost index 50 vs 49; higher = cheaper, from World Bank price levels).

Which is warmer, Madīnat Ḩamad or Ar Rifā‘?

Ar Rifā‘ — summer highs reach about 34.8°C versus 34.8°C in Madīnat Ḩamad.

Which is safer from natural disasters, Madīnat Ḩamad or Ar Rifā‘?

Ar Rifā‘ (disaster-safety 62/100). Main hazard: drought in Madīnat Ḩamad, drought in Ar Rifā‘.

What is the main natural-disaster risk in Madīnat Ḩamad?

drought is the dominant modelled hazard for Madīnat Ḩamad on our risk index.

How is the Madīnat Ḩamad vs Ar Rifā‘ comparison calculated?

Cost comes from World Bank price levels, climate from 1991–2020 normals, and disaster risk from USGS earthquake data, cyclone-basin position and flood exposure; livability is their weighted composite.

Madīnat Ḩamad profile →
Ar Rifā‘ profile →