Rome vs Ho Chi Minh City

Overall Ho Chi Minh City ranks higher for livability (66 vs 59). Ho Chi Minh City is cheaper; Rome is safer from disasters; Ho Chi Minh City is warmer.
Compared (0-100)
■ Rome■ Ho Chi Minh City1762Cost9874Climate6863Safety

How to read the comparison chart

The grouped bars score each city 0–100 on cost, climate and safety — taller is better. Rome leads on any axis where its bar is higher, Ho Chi Minh City where its is. The cost bar uses a higher-is-cheaper scale, so Ho Chi Minh City's taller cost bar reflects its lower cost of living, not a higher price.

AxisRomeHo Chi Minh City
Livability5966
Cost (higher=cheaper)1762
Climate9874
Safety6863
Summer °C24.429.1
Winter °C7.725.9
Top disaster riskwildfirestorms (hurricane/cyclone)

Rome vs Ho Chi Minh City: the short answer

Ho Chi Minh City comes out ahead on overall livability (66/100), modestly above Rome (59/100). The two cities diverge most on cost of living. On affordability Ho Chi Minh City is the cheaper base — a wide gap on our cost index (Rome 17 vs Ho Chi Minh City 62, where a higher score means a lower cost of living, normalised from World Bank price levels). For climate, Ho Chi Minh City runs warmer in summer (about 29.1°C peak vs 24.4°C in Rome), while winter lows sit near 7.7°C in Rome and 25.9°C in Ho Chi Minh City. On natural-disaster exposure Rome is the safer choice (safety 68/100); the dominant modelled hazard is wildfire for Rome and storms (hurricane/cyclone) for Ho Chi Minh City.

Which city should you choose?

Data & methodology

Cost scores are normalised from World Bank price-level data. Climate figures (summer highs, winter lows) are drawn from 1991–2020 climate normals. Disaster-safety blends USGS earthquake history (magnitude 4.5+ within 300 km since 1980), tropical-cyclone basin position, flood/elevation exposure and Köppen climate zone. The livability score is the weighted composite of cost, climate and safety. All figures are planning indicators for 2026, not guarantees — verify specifics before relocating.

Compiled by the CityLivably data team from open public datasets (World Bank, USGS, climate normals).

FAQ

Is Rome or Ho Chi Minh City better to live in?

Ho Chi Minh City scores higher overall — 66 vs 59 on our 0–100 livability index, which weights cost, climate and safety.

Which is cheaper, Rome or Ho Chi Minh City?

Ho Chi Minh City has the lower cost of living (cost index 62 vs 17; higher = cheaper, from World Bank price levels).

Which is warmer, Rome or Ho Chi Minh City?

Ho Chi Minh City — summer highs reach about 29.1°C versus 24.4°C in Rome.

Which is safer from natural disasters, Rome or Ho Chi Minh City?

Rome (disaster-safety 68/100). Main hazard: wildfire in Rome, storms (hurricane/cyclone) in Ho Chi Minh City.

What is the main natural-disaster risk in Rome?

wildfire is the dominant modelled hazard for Rome on our risk index.

How is the Rome vs Ho Chi Minh City comparison calculated?

Cost comes from World Bank price levels, climate from 1991–2020 normals, and disaster risk from USGS earthquake data, cyclone-basin position and flood exposure; livability is their weighted composite.

Rome profile →
Ho Chi Minh City profile →