Stróvolos vs Famagusta

Overall Famagusta ranks higher for livability (64 vs 62). Famagusta is cheaper; Stróvolos is safer from disasters; Stróvolos is warmer.
Compared (0-100)
■ Stróvolos■ Famagusta5152Cost7484Climate6258Safety

How to read the comparison chart

The grouped bars score each city 0–100 on cost, climate and safety — taller is better. Stróvolos leads on any axis where its bar is higher, Famagusta where its is. The cost bar uses a higher-is-cheaper scale, so Famagusta's taller cost bar reflects its lower cost of living, not a higher price.

AxisStróvolosFamagusta
Livability6264
Cost (higher=cheaper)5152
Climate7484
Safety6258
Summer °C29.227.2
Winter °C10.411.0
Top disaster riskdroughtwildfire

Stróvolos vs Famagusta: the short answer

Famagusta comes out ahead on overall livability (64/100), only marginally above Stróvolos (62/100). The two cities diverge most on climate. On affordability Famagusta is the cheaper base — nearly identical prices on our cost index (Stróvolos 51 vs Famagusta 52, where a higher score means a lower cost of living, normalised from World Bank price levels). For climate, Stróvolos runs warmer in summer (about 29.2°C peak vs 27.2°C in Famagusta), while winter lows sit near 10.4°C in Stróvolos and 11.0°C in Famagusta. On natural-disaster exposure Stróvolos is the safer choice (safety 62/100); the dominant modelled hazard is drought for Stróvolos and wildfire for Famagusta.

Which city should you choose?

Data & methodology

Cost scores are normalised from World Bank price-level data. Climate figures (summer highs, winter lows) are drawn from 1991–2020 climate normals. Disaster-safety blends USGS earthquake history (magnitude 4.5+ within 300 km since 1980), tropical-cyclone basin position, flood/elevation exposure and Köppen climate zone. The livability score is the weighted composite of cost, climate and safety. All figures are planning indicators for 2026, not guarantees — verify specifics before relocating.

Compiled by the CityLivably data team from open public datasets (World Bank, USGS, climate normals).

FAQ

Is Stróvolos or Famagusta better to live in?

Famagusta scores higher overall — 64 vs 62 on our 0–100 livability index, which weights cost, climate and safety.

Which is cheaper, Stróvolos or Famagusta?

Famagusta has the lower cost of living (cost index 52 vs 51; higher = cheaper, from World Bank price levels).

Which is warmer, Stróvolos or Famagusta?

Stróvolos — summer highs reach about 29.2°C versus 27.2°C in Famagusta.

Which is safer from natural disasters, Stróvolos or Famagusta?

Stróvolos (disaster-safety 62/100). Main hazard: drought in Stróvolos, wildfire in Famagusta.

What is the main natural-disaster risk in Stróvolos?

drought is the dominant modelled hazard for Stróvolos on our risk index.

How is the Stróvolos vs Famagusta comparison calculated?

Cost comes from World Bank price levels, climate from 1991–2020 normals, and disaster risk from USGS earthquake data, cyclone-basin position and flood exposure; livability is their weighted composite.

Stróvolos profile →
Famagusta profile →