Västerås vs Södermalm

Overall Södermalm ranks higher for livability (66 vs 65). Södermalm is cheaper; Södermalm is safer from disasters; Västerås is warmer.
Compared (0-100)
■ Västerås■ Södermalm4949Cost7981Climate7070Safety

How to read the comparison chart

The grouped bars score each city 0–100 on cost, climate and safety — taller is better. Västerås leads on any axis where its bar is higher, Södermalm where its is. The cost bar uses a higher-is-cheaper scale, so Södermalm's taller cost bar reflects its lower cost of living, not a higher price.

AxisVästeråsSödermalm
Livability6566
Cost (higher=cheaper)4949
Climate7981
Safety7070
Summer °C17.116.7
Winter °C-3.5-2.8
Top disaster riskextreme cold / winterextreme cold / winter

Västerås vs Södermalm: the short answer

Södermalm comes out ahead on overall livability (66/100), only marginally above Västerås (65/100). The two cities diverge most on climate. On affordability Södermalm is the cheaper base — nearly identical prices on our cost index (Västerås 49 vs Södermalm 49, where a higher score means a lower cost of living, normalised from World Bank price levels). For climate, Västerås runs warmer in summer (about 17.1°C peak vs 16.7°C in Södermalm), while winter lows sit near -3.5°C in Västerås and -2.8°C in Södermalm. On natural-disaster exposure Södermalm is the safer choice (safety 70/100); the dominant modelled hazard is extreme cold / winter for Västerås and extreme cold / winter for Södermalm.

Which city should you choose?

Data & methodology

Cost scores are normalised from World Bank price-level data. Climate figures (summer highs, winter lows) are drawn from 1991–2020 climate normals. Disaster-safety blends USGS earthquake history (magnitude 4.5+ within 300 km since 1980), tropical-cyclone basin position, flood/elevation exposure and Köppen climate zone. The livability score is the weighted composite of cost, climate and safety. All figures are planning indicators for 2026, not guarantees — verify specifics before relocating.

Compiled by the CityLivably data team from open public datasets (World Bank, USGS, climate normals).

FAQ

Is Västerås or Södermalm better to live in?

Södermalm scores higher overall — 66 vs 65 on our 0–100 livability index, which weights cost, climate and safety.

Which is cheaper, Västerås or Södermalm?

Södermalm has the lower cost of living (cost index 49 vs 49; higher = cheaper, from World Bank price levels).

Which is warmer, Västerås or Södermalm?

Västerås — summer highs reach about 17.1°C versus 16.7°C in Södermalm.

Which is safer from natural disasters, Västerås or Södermalm?

Södermalm (disaster-safety 70/100). Main hazard: extreme cold / winter in Västerås, extreme cold / winter in Södermalm.

What is the main natural-disaster risk in Västerås?

extreme cold / winter is the dominant modelled hazard for Västerås on our risk index.

How is the Västerås vs Södermalm comparison calculated?

Cost comes from World Bank price levels, climate from 1991–2020 normals, and disaster risk from USGS earthquake data, cyclone-basin position and flood exposure; livability is their weighted composite.

Västerås profile →
Södermalm profile →