Yokohama vs Osaka
How to read the comparison chart
The grouped bars score each city 0–100 on cost, climate and safety — taller is better. Yokohama leads on any axis where its bar is higher, Osaka where its is. The cost bar uses a higher-is-cheaper scale, so Yokohama's taller cost bar reflects its lower cost of living, not a higher price.
| Axis | Yokohama | Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| Livability | 58 | 51 |
| Cost (higher=cheaper) | 42 | 33 |
| Climate | 86 | 78 |
| Safety | 51 | 46 |
| Summer °C | 26.8 | 28.1 |
| Winter °C | 6.0 | 5.3 |
| Top disaster risk | earthquake | storms (hurricane/cyclone) |
Yokohama vs Osaka: the short answer
Yokohama comes out ahead on overall livability (58/100), modestly above Osaka (51/100). The two cities diverge most on cost of living. On affordability Yokohama is the cheaper base — a moderate gap on our cost index (Yokohama 42 vs Osaka 33, where a higher score means a lower cost of living, normalised from World Bank price levels). For climate, Osaka runs warmer in summer (about 28.1°C peak vs 26.8°C in Yokohama), while winter lows sit near 6.0°C in Yokohama and 5.3°C in Osaka. On natural-disaster exposure Yokohama is the safer choice (safety 51/100); the dominant modelled hazard is earthquake for Yokohama and storms (hurricane/cyclone) for Osaka.
Which city should you choose?
- On a tight budget → Yokohama — lower everyday costs..
- You want warmth → Osaka — hotter summers.
- Safety is the priority → Yokohama — lower disaster risk.
- Best all-rounder → Yokohama — highest overall livability.
Data & methodology
Cost scores are normalised from World Bank price-level data. Climate figures (summer highs, winter lows) are drawn from 1991–2020 climate normals. Disaster-safety blends USGS earthquake history (magnitude 4.5+ within 300 km since 1980), tropical-cyclone basin position, flood/elevation exposure and Köppen climate zone. The livability score is the weighted composite of cost, climate and safety. All figures are planning indicators for 2026, not guarantees — verify specifics before relocating.
FAQ
Is Yokohama or Osaka better to live in?
Yokohama scores higher overall — 58 vs 51 on our 0–100 livability index, which weights cost, climate and safety.
Which is cheaper, Yokohama or Osaka?
Yokohama has the lower cost of living (cost index 42 vs 33; higher = cheaper, from World Bank price levels).
Which is warmer, Yokohama or Osaka?
Osaka — summer highs reach about 28.1°C versus 26.8°C in Yokohama.
Which is safer from natural disasters, Yokohama or Osaka?
Yokohama (disaster-safety 51/100). Main hazard: earthquake in Yokohama, storms (hurricane/cyclone) in Osaka.
What is the main natural-disaster risk in Yokohama?
earthquake is the dominant modelled hazard for Yokohama on our risk index.
How is the Yokohama vs Osaka comparison calculated?
Cost comes from World Bank price levels, climate from 1991–2020 normals, and disaster risk from USGS earthquake data, cyclone-basin position and flood exposure; livability is their weighted composite.